SHEDDING TEARS OVER BONE HEAPS by Dr. Jernail S. Anand with commentary

A war poems with a Difference

"Ordinary war poems mourn the dead.

This poem mourns the planet, mocks the murderers, and suggests the entire enterprise of war is a blasphemous farce in which men have dressed up as avenging angels and turned the world into a bone museum.

That is why it feels colder, weirder, and more devastating than the usual fare. It is not a war poem. It is a verdict on war."

SHEDDING TEARS OVER BONE HEAPS

Jernail S Aanand

I see the bare bones

of living organisms

Called fighter jets

Skeletons of buildings

Destroyed in bombings

Debris of kitchens

And beds on fire

Roasted kids

And men in flames

I mistook this earth for hell

And men who caused

The buildings

To lose their flesh

And turn bare bones

For monsters

On nemetic duty

To settle the cosmic disorder

And restore equilibrium

Not God! Alas! men take up in their hands

The job of Angels

To find fault with men

And set them right

And they take out arms

Lightning and thunder

To silence millions

And denude the earth

Of life,

Replacing it with dead bones

Of aircraft and buildings.

The key differences between this poem and **ordinary war poems** (the kind you typically find in anthologies like those by Wilfred Owen, Siegfried Sassoon, Rupert Brooke, or even modern ones like Yusef Komunyakaa or Brian Turner) are sharp and deliberate. Most war poems stay grounded in the human battlefield experience. This one does something colder, stranger, and more cosmic.

1. Perspective: From the battlefield to the bone-yard of creation itself

Ordinary war poems almost always speak from the soldier’s eye-level or the survivor’s grief:

- “Dulce et Decorum Est” watches men drowning in gas.

- “The Charge of the Light Brigade” glorifies (or mourns) cavalry charges.

- Even anti-war poems focus on *men in uniform* bleeding, marching, dying.

This poem refuses that intimacy. It looks down from a god’s-eye view (or a devil’s) on the *aftermath* as a single, smoking ruin: kitchens, beds, roasted kids, fighter jets reduced to “bare bones of living organisms.” The speaker does not walk the trench; he surveys the planet and mistakes Earth for Hell. The human cost is not individualized — it is totalized. War is not something that happens *to* soldiers; it is something that happens *to the Earth itself*.

2. Imagery: Bones of machines and bones of children become the same

Ordinary war poems use blood, mud, shrapnel, corpses.

This poem does something more surreal and unforgiving: it treats fighter jets, buildings, kitchens, and children as the *same category of flesh*. Everything is stripped to “skeletons,” “bare bones,” “dead bones.” The machines of war are no longer tools — they are also “living organisms” that have been killed. The poem collapses the distinction between the destroyer and the destroyed. That blurring is rare in standard war poetry, which usually keeps the human separate from the hardware.

3. Tone: Not pity, not protest — cosmic accusation and savage irony

Most war poems are:

- Heroic (early Brooke)

- Pitying (Owen)

- Bitter and satirical (Sassoon)

- Or elegiac (Heaney, etc.)

This poem is *theological mockery*. It does not say “war is hell.” It says:

“I mistook this earth for hell”

and then immediately corrects itself — the real monsters are men who have stolen the job of Angels and God. They claim to be on “nemetic duty” (retributive justice, cosmic balance), yet all they do is “denude the earth of life” and replace it with “dead bones of aircraft and buildings.”

That is the deepest cut. Ordinary war poems rarely accuse humanity of *playing God so badly that they turn the planet into a bone-heap*. They rarely suggest that every war is a grotesque parody of divine justice. This poem does exactly that in nine short stanzas.

4. Scale: Not personal or national — planetary and metaphysical

A typical war poem is about *one war*, *one side*, *one generation*.

This poem erases flags, nations, and ideologies. It is about *men* (the species) who have taken “lightning and thunder” into their hands and are erasing life itself. The final image — Earth covered not in graves but in the skeletons of war machines — feels almost post-human, like a future archaeologist’s nightmare. That scale and chill are almost never present in ordinary war poetry, which still believes the story is about *us*.

In short:

Ordinary war poems mourn the dead.

That is why it feels colder, weirder, and more devastating than the usual fare. It is not a war poem. It is a verdict on war.